Why CEOs' secret romances affect corporate finances

Following the famous kisscam infidelity case at the Coldplay concert in the United States a few months ago, public scrutiny has focused on the cases of internal affairs that arise within companies.

This case highlighted that some companies have policies that restrict or prohibit romantic relationships between their employees, especially when it comes to relationships between bosses and subordinates.

See more: 'Anti-Cachones Law' in Colombia: The law proposed by a presidential candidate

The main argument is to avoid conflicts of interest, favoritism, or work decisions influenced by personal matters. They also seek to reduce the risk of harassment or discrimination lawsuits , since in many legal contexts, these types of situations can result in complex lawsuits for the company.

However, these measures are often controversial. Some consider that such policies invade workers' private lives and that, rather than prohibiting them , it would be appropriate to establish clear rules for transparency and relationship management in the workplace.

Read more: What is the psychological stance if you have a partner and like someone else?

In practice, absolute prohibitions are difficult to enforce, as people spend much of their time at work, and emotional bonds often develop.

Cases of large companies

Large companies like Google, Facebook (Meta), and McDonald's have had strict policies regarding employee relations, especially when they involve someone in a position of power over another person.

See more: The awkward moment at a Coldplay concert that went viral and reached running.

At Google, for example, any relationship must be reported to human resources to avoid conflicts of interest; Meta applies similar rules to ensure transparency ; and McDonald's even fired its former CEO in 2019 after discovering he was having a relationship with an employee , highlighting how these rules can have severe consequences for senior management. These measures show that, while relationships are not always completely prohibited, they are heavily regulated to protect reputation and the work environment.

Million-dollar losses

According to an analysis published in The Times titled 'Trapped! Another boss is out. Beware the new morality,' a 2016 study in the Journal of Financial Economics examined 219 cases of CEO “indiscretions”—many related to sex scandals or inappropriate affairs—and found that, following the announcement of these controversies, companies suffered an average loss of 4.1% in shareholder value, equivalent to approximately $226 million in just three days after the announcement. Moreover, share prices continued to decline for more than a year after the scandal. See more: Video: Coldplay's Chris Martin joked about infidelity case caught on kiss-cam

This article analyzes how the cultural and corporate environment regarding workplace romances, especially between CEOs and subordinates, has radically changed. What once embodied a certain permissiveness, as depicted in the film Indecent Proposal (1993), now carries severe consequences: immediate dismissals, reputational damage, and significant financial losses for companies.

Names like Nestlé's Laurent Freixe and BP's Bernard Looney exemplify this new reality, where internal relations can lead to corporate discord and severe financial penalties.

See more: CEO of US company featured in viral Coldplay concert video resigns​ The article details how such indiscretions—very common among senior executives—are no longer passively tolerated. Freixe, for example, was fired without an exit package after a relationship with a subordinate, revealing the personal cost of such acts: damaged reputation, revoked contracts, and devastated public image. Surveillance mechanisms have intensified , from digital surveillance to internal whistleblowing, demonstrating that the contemporary corporate environment demands total transparency.

PORTFOLIO